Jordan’s Affordable Housing Crisis

Harriet Brown
Harriet Brown
3 min read

The Kingdom of Jordan has long had issues with a lack of affordable housing, mainly due to its rapidly increasing population; although the country itself is politically stable, its proximity to areas of conflict and turmoil have led to the influx of large numbers of refugees, which have strained the country’s resources. Currently there are nearly 750,000 persons of concern in the country; most of these are Syrian but there are also substantial numbers of Iraqis, Yemenis and Sudanis (UNHCR). It is estimated that there are currently 1.3 million Jordanians and Syrians living in substandard housing (Jordan Response Plan), and that the Kingdom needs at least 100,000 new housing units in order to keep up with demand (Jordan Green Building Council). This shortage is exacerbated by conditions for builders and developers in the country, who are hampered by high land prices and excessive bureaucracy. Building permits are difficult to secure, and it has been estimated that builders can pay up to a third of a project’s value in taxes and fees (The Economist, Why Arab states have lots of expensive villas, June 14 2018). Zoning restrictions are also a problem; a controversial bylaw, passed in May 2018, stipulates minimum apartment sizes of 110 - 130 square metres for new-builds in certain zones, despite the massive demand for smaller properties, especially in Amman and other urban areas. As a result, builders and developers have tended towards the larger and luxury end of the market, leading to an over-supply of high-end properties and a shortage of affordable housing.

 

amman jordan cityAmman Jordan City

 

The Kingdom has made efforts to combat this shortage, including building social housing projects, establishing the Housing Loan Subsidy Programme and the Jordan Mortgage Refinance Company, and launching the Royal Housing Initiative ‘Decent Housing for Decent Living’, but these have had limited success, and the government has had more pressing economic issues to deal with, including increasing unemployment and sluggish GDP growth. Jordan is a country with few natural resources and a small economy; external investment has been hampered by red tape and ‘widespread’ corruption, according to the 2020 Index of Economic Freedom.

 

One recent effort to tackle the low-income housing shortage showed more promise; the Jordan Affordable Housing Programme (JAH) was launched in 2014 as a joint enterprise between the government (specifically the Housing and Urban Development Corporation (HUDC) within the Ministry of Public Works and Housing (MoPWH)), UN-Habitat, and the private sector. The project was designed to reduce the spending burden for the government, who would act as facilitator rather than builder; instead, the construction would be financed by private investors, both individual and commercial. The model was to build smaller housing units of around 60 square metres (with potential to extend in the future), for which financing would be provided to the owner/investor. These units could then be rented to Jordanian or Syrian families in need, in return for which the banks would offer a further interest rate subsidy. Phase I of the JAH, which comprised the design of the scheme along with a pilot project of 20 units constructed in Ramtha, was completed in 2016. Phase II, which would have involved the implementation of the scheme at scale, including the building of a further 30,000 units, was due to be completed by 2018 but unfortunately seems to have stalled. It is unclear why this expansion of the scheme has not happened, although the Ramtha pilot was considered a success.

 

petra, jordanPetra

 

Despite this, the public-private model has proved popular with stakeholders; in 2018 the Jordanian government announced a new national housing programme, which would again be implemented in cooperation with private investors. Billed as an ‘investment opportunity for the private sector’ (Ministry of Public Works & Housing), the aim is to build 900 residential units in the Zarqa, Mafraq, Amman, Tafileh and Karak regions, along with developing several healthcare and public service projects in these areas. The HUDC claims that an estimated 4,500 people will benefit from this housing scheme, which is forecast to meet up to 20% of the housing need in these areas (The Jordan Times, Studies on national housing programme in the works, 15 Sep 2018). It is to be hoped that this venture will ease the affordable housing crisis by paving the way for similar projects in the future.

Leave a Comment
Recent Articles
Subscribe


Sign up to receive the Propeterra's newsletter and exclusive property news and updates. You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking on the unsubscribe links in our emails.

 

 

posts by tag

See all

Market Cover_Emerging Markets-1

 

Market Cover_Frontier Markets-1

 

Market Cover_Special Situations-1-1

 

Market Cover_Developed Markets-1

 

Recent Articles

3 minutes read

Mongolia’s Active Diplomacy in a Post-COP World

In November, Mongolia celebrated sixty years as part of the United Nations (UN). For many countries, this means little, as such milestones, by definition, come and pass on a regular basis. It assumes greater importance for Mongolia, though, given the particular geopolitical framework it has to work with. By dint of geography, this vast country has an unusual position. In a strategically important location between Russia and China, it is relevant to not only its own prosperity but also the broader world. Since independence, Mongolia has tried to maintain constructive relations with those it shares borders, but also to project beyond North Asia. Its successful third neighbour policy, takes in partners from South Korea to Japan, India to the United States.

Mongolia

4 minutes read

Investing in Good or a Good Investment?

How can we judge the environmental impact of property development?
‘Sustainable’, ‘green’, ‘eco-friendly’, ‘ethical’: too frequently seen as - and
used as - zeitgeisty buzzwords to allay any discomfort investors may feel
over looking for the next most profitable venture. But anyone with even
half an eye on the news and weather reports can see that environmental
sustainability can not be merely an optional consideration when planning
developments or deciding where to invest – especially when it comes to
real estate, given that almost 40% of carbon emissions are from the built
environment. But in a world with such interconnected systems and
ecologies, how can we predict impacts that may be surprising and far
reaching?

AidData, a research lab at the College of William and Mary, Virginia, has
been developing the technology and resources to do just that. Their team
includes economists, political scientists, geographers, developers,
program evaluators, policy analysts, and communications professionals,
and they work with 21 different countries in Asia, Latin America and
Africa, using data and hard evidence to improve policy and development
outcomes, helping policymakers to move towards the UN’s 17 Sustainable
Development Goals.

Using satellite, household survey, economic, health, and other spatial
data, along with machine learning analysis and super-accurate data on
geographical boundaries, AidData have created various tools to analyse
the impacts of various development programs, and to predict whether
similar programs would work in other locations. Their Geospatial Impact
Evaluation methods enable fast and rigorous analysis of outcomes for
localised development projects, replicating the standards of a randomised
controlled trial. Development agencies and governments are able to very
quickly discover whether some certain infrastructure project, for example
irrigation systems or village road improvement, had the desired effect on
outcomes like infant mortality, poverty, or deforestation. The highly
localised and granular data can also show whether outcomes are uneven
from region to region, allowing more targeted development in future.
Is there a way we can apply the same rigorous impact-analysis to our
small-scale investments that AidData is enabling international
development agencies and world governments to apply to their
investment in aid, infrastructure, health, and other initiatives?

Environmental, Social, and Corporate Governance are becoming ever
more important criteria when analysing an investment’s risks and
opportunities. In many emerging markets such as Malaysia and Indonesia,
the Islamic finance sector is growing more and more influential too, with
its strong alignment to ESG principles. Propeterra is looking at ways to
adapt the Geospatial Impact Evaluation methods created by AidData and apply them to affordable and social housing projects in emerging and

Social Impact

4 minutes read

Addressing the Global Affordable Housing Shortfall

 

Housing Crisis