Impact Investment in the Philippines

Lee M Cashell
Lee M Cashell
3 min read

Impact investment - which aims to generate a beneficial social or environmental output, as well as financial returns - is on the rise throughout South-East Asia. And one of the region’s major impact investment markets is, perhaps unexpectedly, the Philippines. In fact, the country is the second largest market in the region by amount of capital deployed (Global Impact Investing Network). Impact investment first started in the Philippines in around 2007 with the emergence of microfinance, and has since expanded to cover a wide range of sectors. The country is now also home to a range of Impact-focused incubators and accelerators, aiding the emergence of this type of socially beneficial financing.

 

bonifacio global city, philippensBonifacio Global City, Philippines

 

There are several reasons why the Philippines offers an attractive environment to outside investors, including a stable currency, low inflation outlook and steady average growth rates. Although there have been problems with corruption in the past, with the 2020 Index of Economic Freedom describing political cronyism as ‘pervasive’, recent efforts to combat this and improve governmental integrity have been encouraging. As a result, foreign direct investment has soared, with a net inflow of approximately $7.9 billion in 2016 (Global Impact Investing Network).

 

The most popular impact investment sectors in the Philippines include infrastructure, agriculture, energy, and fintech, but not, perhaps surprisingly, housing. This is certainly not from a lack of need, as the country has been suffering from an affordable housing crisis for some years. Whilst the country benefits from having a very young, literate workforce, there is still high income inequality and many families still live in poverty. Add to this displacement from natural disasters, and a country which is rapidly urbanising, and this is a perfect storm which leads to a serious lack of housing for the lower-income sections of society.

 

Affordable housing is split into three different categories in the Philippines - ‘socialised housing’, which is for projects costing P450,000 or below; ‘economic housing’, which costs from P450,000-P1.7 million, and ‘low cost housing’, which costs between P1.7 million and P3 million. However, the latter may be something of a misnomer, as in order to afford a ‘low cost’ property a household would need to be earning over P680,000 a year. Currently, a staggering 80% of the country’s households earn less than this amount.

 

kristine-wook

 

A 2016 study undertaken by CRC-UA&P (University of Asia & Pacific) and SHDA (Subdivision & Housing Developers Association) shows the extent of this problem. As of 2015, there was a backlog of nearly six million affordable housing units, divided into 1.3 million ‘socialised’, 3.7 million ‘economic’, and 900,000 ‘low cost’. The ‘Impact of Housing Activities on the Philippine Economy’ study estimates that there will be a housing shortage of 12.3 million units by 2030, and recommends a two-pronged approach towards solving this problem, consisting of buyer financing assistance and a housing subsidy. The government has implemented some financial assistance programmes in recent years, and has also put in place incentives to encourage developers to build more low-cost housing, such as income tax holidays and VAT exemptions. However, these have had limited success. The Balanced Housing Act was another attempt to increase affordable housing, ensuring that at least 20% of new developments must be ‘economic’ housing in the same city. In practice, compliance is low, possibly due to a lack of an efficient regulatory framework or efficient sanctions.

 

One development which has proved to be very successful is in Quezon City, and was undertaken by the local government unit (LGU) in a public-private partnership with Phinma Property Holdings. Dubbed ‘Bistekville’, the development included over 900 ‘row’ houses aimed at solving the problem of ‘informal settler families’, or ISFs - families who were living in areas considered danger zones, such as those living under power lines, along rivers and those who had been displaced by infrastructure projects or eviction. NGO Habitat for Humanity estimated that there were more than 200,000 such families in the Quezon City area living in this situation in 2011. The government provides cheap financing for the families, who would otherwise not be able to get bank loans, and units can be paid for over any length of time up to 30 years. The development was so successful that Bistekville II, III and IV are all now in the pipeline.

 

Such developments offer more benefits than simply housing families; the CRC-UA&P study indicated that there are many knock-on effects of increased building of affordable housing, such as increased employment opportunities and improved income. This being the case, it is perhaps strange that there are not more impact investment opportunities around affordable housing in the Philippines. It is to be hoped that with the success of the Phinma/LGU partnerships and Bistekville developments, more investment opportunities in this sector will arise in the future.

Leave a Comment
Recent Articles
Subscribe


Sign up to receive the Propeterra's newsletter and exclusive property news and updates. You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking on the unsubscribe links in our emails.

 

 

posts by tag

See all

Market Cover_Emerging Markets-1

 

Market Cover_Frontier Markets-1

 

Market Cover_Special Situations-1-1

 

Market Cover_Developed Markets-1

 

Recent Articles

3 minutes read

Mongolia’s Active Diplomacy in a Post-COP World

In November, Mongolia celebrated sixty years as part of the United Nations (UN). For many countries, this means little, as such milestones, by definition, come and pass on a regular basis. It assumes greater importance for Mongolia, though, given the particular geopolitical framework it has to work with. By dint of geography, this vast country has an unusual position. In a strategically important location between Russia and China, it is relevant to not only its own prosperity but also the broader world. Since independence, Mongolia has tried to maintain constructive relations with those it shares borders, but also to project beyond North Asia. Its successful third neighbour policy, takes in partners from South Korea to Japan, India to the United States.

Mongolia

4 minutes read

Investing in Good or a Good Investment?

How can we judge the environmental impact of property development?
‘Sustainable’, ‘green’, ‘eco-friendly’, ‘ethical’: too frequently seen as - and
used as - zeitgeisty buzzwords to allay any discomfort investors may feel
over looking for the next most profitable venture. But anyone with even
half an eye on the news and weather reports can see that environmental
sustainability can not be merely an optional consideration when planning
developments or deciding where to invest – especially when it comes to
real estate, given that almost 40% of carbon emissions are from the built
environment. But in a world with such interconnected systems and
ecologies, how can we predict impacts that may be surprising and far
reaching?

AidData, a research lab at the College of William and Mary, Virginia, has
been developing the technology and resources to do just that. Their team
includes economists, political scientists, geographers, developers,
program evaluators, policy analysts, and communications professionals,
and they work with 21 different countries in Asia, Latin America and
Africa, using data and hard evidence to improve policy and development
outcomes, helping policymakers to move towards the UN’s 17 Sustainable
Development Goals.

Using satellite, household survey, economic, health, and other spatial
data, along with machine learning analysis and super-accurate data on
geographical boundaries, AidData have created various tools to analyse
the impacts of various development programs, and to predict whether
similar programs would work in other locations. Their Geospatial Impact
Evaluation methods enable fast and rigorous analysis of outcomes for
localised development projects, replicating the standards of a randomised
controlled trial. Development agencies and governments are able to very
quickly discover whether some certain infrastructure project, for example
irrigation systems or village road improvement, had the desired effect on
outcomes like infant mortality, poverty, or deforestation. The highly
localised and granular data can also show whether outcomes are uneven
from region to region, allowing more targeted development in future.
Is there a way we can apply the same rigorous impact-analysis to our
small-scale investments that AidData is enabling international
development agencies and world governments to apply to their
investment in aid, infrastructure, health, and other initiatives?

Environmental, Social, and Corporate Governance are becoming ever
more important criteria when analysing an investment’s risks and
opportunities. In many emerging markets such as Malaysia and Indonesia,
the Islamic finance sector is growing more and more influential too, with
its strong alignment to ESG principles. Propeterra is looking at ways to
adapt the Geospatial Impact Evaluation methods created by AidData and apply them to affordable and social housing projects in emerging and

Social Impact

4 minutes read

Addressing the Global Affordable Housing Shortfall

 

Housing Crisis